The Whatcom Excavator
  • Home
    • About Us
    • Who's Planning Our Lives?
    • Diminishing Property Rights
    • NGO's & Public-Private Partners
    • Agenda 21
    • Buzzwords
    • Deep Thought
    • Best Available Science
    • Best Available Humor >
      • Humor Archive
  • The DREDGE
    • Gotta See This
    • How To Dredge
  • Bulldozed
    • Eco-Activism and County Policy
    • CELDF - "Democracy"
    • ALERT: Community Energy Challenge
  • Pig Trough
    • ReSources
    • Sustainable Connections
    • BALLE
    • ICLEI
    • Whatcom County Community Network
    • Big Wheels Award
  • Contact Us

Deconstructing the Declaration of Independence

7/5/2013

1 Comment

 
PictureThomas Jefferson
WE usually try to stick to local issues, but because of the Independence Day holiday, and as a follow-up to our last post, WE wanted to share something that a reader brought to our attention. It is a fascinating essay explaining how Thomas Jefferson and his collaborators developed the style and logic contained in the Declaration of Independence. 

The founders were declaring independence from Great Britain, of course. But they had to justify it not only to their fellow colonists, but to the rest of the world, including potential allies who would never interfere in a civil war. 

The article begins,

The Declaration of Independence is perhaps the most masterfully written state paper of Western civilization. As Moses Coit Tyler noted almost a century ago, no assessment of it can be complete without taking into account its extraordinary merits as a work of political prose style. Although many scholars have recognized those merits, there are surprisingly few sustained studies of the stylistic artistry of the Declaration. This essay seeks to illuminate that artistry by probing the discourse microscopically--at the level of the sentence, phrase, word, and syllable. By approaching the Declaration in this way, we can shed light both on its literary qualities and on its rhetorical power as a work designed to convince a "candid world" that the American colonies were justified in seeking to establish themselves as an independent nation.
The thing WE find lacking today, is that the principles contained in the Declaration were considered commonplace to its original readers ("We hold these truths to be self-evident" -- the word "we" meant almost everyone, not just the writers), as the article illustrates:
Although the preamble is the best known part of the Declaration today, it attracted considerably less attention in its own time. For most eighteenth-century readers, it was an unobjectionable statement of commonplace political principles. As Jefferson explained years later, the purpose of the Declaration was "not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of . . . but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take."
WE fear that these principles are not commonplace anymore. The loss of this understanding may be at the root of many of the problems we face today.

The article then goes on to explain how, based on these principles, the colonists were justified in changing their form of government:
Unlike the preamble, however, which most eighteenth-century readers could readily accept as self-evident, the indictment of the king required proof. In keeping with the rhetorical conventions Englishmen had followed for centuries when dethroning a "tyrannical" monarch, the Declaration contains a bill of particulars documenting the king's "repeated injuries and usurpations" of the Americans' rights and liberties. The bill of particulars lists twenty-eight specific grievances and is introduced with the shortest sentence of the Declaration:

To prove this [the king's tyranny], let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

This sentence is so innocuous one can easily overlook its artistry and importance. The opening phrase--"To prove this"--indicates the "facts" to follow will indeed prove that George III is a tyrant. But prove to whom? To a "candid world"--that is, to readers who are free from bias or malice, who are fair, impartial, and just. The implication is that any such reader will see the "facts" as demonstrating beyond doubt that the king has sought to establish an absolute tyranny in America. If a reader is not convinced, it is not because the "facts" are untrue or are insufficient to prove the king's villainy; it is because the reader is not "candid."
Reading the Declaration of Independence, WE follow the reasoning and the logic from one line to the next, and we realize how the colonists were justified in their indictment of King George III. 

Today, WE fear, too many people do not recognize tyranny and oppression when they see it. What's more, they applaud it! Truth be told, they think a nannying, dictatorial government is desirable, and they want more of it! As if we humans are not capable of managing our own affairs (or protecting our environment), we need special humans to do that for us. But which "special" humans? Well, the ones we agree with, of course! Ah yes, but don't you see? There's the rub! People don't agree. When we're talking about special people controlling other people's lives, we must agree. But we don't. But we must. Norman, co-ordinate! (cultural reference)

WE do not know why the understanding of the principles of liberty and freedom no longer seem self-evident to contemporary citizens. Perhaps it is because we have become too complacent. Maybe the American form of government that Jefferson and Madison help to create was so effective that we are too prosperous to pay attention to the things that really matter. Perhaps we're lulled into a sense of security that the Constitution will protect us without anyone actively upholding and defending it. Perhaps we haven't noticed the oppression and bureaucratic tyranny that has been creeping up on us. 

Heaven knows, WE certainly do not want to endure a second revolution, especially while we still have a few remaining protections guaranteed in the Constitution. We can still fix what's wrong at the ballot box if citizens get serious, and start participating in the government process.

In any event, WE encourage you to go read the article. It's a long one, but very interesting for its historical and tactical analysis. If you ever need to write a persuasive essay, this is your cookbook. 
1 Comment
HonestAbby
7/14/2013 07:58:44 pm

A republic - if you can keep it. That's what the founders said, and for hundreds of years political hacks and bureaucrats have progressively overtaken government. I don't see much representation anywhere, on any level. What can the public do about it? Are there any leaders out there willing to take on the challenge?

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    WE Dredge!
    Picture
    Posting Rules:
    This forum is moderated.  Please make an effort to substantiate claims that support opinion.  Gratuitous profanity and ad-hominem attacks will not be accepted.  You can create a "nickname" if you'd like, and you don't have to reveal your e-mail address.   Feel free to share information and your honest thoughts.

    Categories

    All
    Agenda 21
    Best Available Science
    Big Government
    Eco Activism
    Ethics
    Freedom
    Planning
    Property Rights
    Science
    Small Business
    Social Engineering
    Taxes
    Welcome

    Archives

    September 2020
    August 2020
    April 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011


    Automatic Updates

    Do you want to be notified when new content is added to this newsfeed? Most browsers allow you to subscribe to our Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feed. Click on the RSS link below, and follow the instructions.

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.