The Whatcom Excavator
  • Home
    • About Us
    • Who's Planning Our Lives?
    • Diminishing Property Rights
    • NGO's & Public-Private Partners
    • Agenda 21
    • Buzzwords
    • Deep Thought
    • Best Available Science
    • Best Available Humor >
      • Humor Archive
  • The DREDGE
    • Gotta See This
    • How To Dredge
  • Bulldozed
    • Eco-Activism and County Policy
    • CELDF - "Democracy"
    • ALERT: Community Energy Challenge
  • Pig Trough
    • ReSources
    • Sustainable Connections
    • BALLE
    • ICLEI
    • Whatcom County Community Network
    • Big Wheels Award
  • Contact Us

Crawford Proposes Support of Salazar/Obama-Plan, Reclassification of Chuckanut Rock, Lummi Rocks and Lummi Carter Point, August 9

8/4/2011

0 Comments

 
A warm and fuzzy, "motherhood and apple pie" item has just popped onto County Council's August 9 agenda:  AB 2011-271.   Originated by Sam Crawford, this bill that doesn't require a public hearing would have the county recommend Chuckanut Rock, Lummi Rocks and Lummi Island's Carter Point (already owned by the federal government) for reclassification by the U.S. Dept of the Interior/BLM as "national conservation areas" (NCA's).   Who would think that sounds anything but grr-eat?   WE.

Maybe this item seems irrelevant, but WE think very little happens in the conservation world without some greater plan in mind.

A couple of readers dredged, and provided two U.S. Department of the Interior items plus substantial other documentation of BLM policies, conservation definitions, and more that made pretty interesting reading.

The first piece to see is this News Release dated June 17, 2011 that's directly tied to this resolution.  It talks about 1,000 acres of federal lands in the San Juan Islands being added to a land inventory with this NCA classification (that the three don't have now), "to enhance conservation and recreation opportunities..." as a part of the President's "America's Great Oudoors" intiative.   What enhancement these lands may receive, it doesn't actually say - or at what cost.   But it promises lots of partnering and collaborating with communities, local agencies and other interested parties.  And, catch this:

    "Salazar said conservation of the islands complements President Obama's America's Great Outdoors initiative to establish a conservation ethic for the 21st century and to reconnect Americans, especially young people, to the natural world."

Gosh, thanks
Mr. President!   We, the people, already own the land.  But you think the federal government needs to make it more meaningful, to reconnect us to it in a 21st century kinda way?   Oh, brother.

A second Deptartment of the Interior/BLM Press Release published just a month later on July 19 moved on to describe Salazar's "push to build a bipartisan wilderness agenda."  While the title of the second release may seem unrelated to the San Juan Island "natural conservation area" classifications, it is.  Both "pushes" are part of the same overarching land conservation package that's headed to Washington DC.  The July release and the referenced letter to Congress talk about how a coordinated plan must manage overall "inventories of public lands and their resource and other values..."   Larsen, Cantwell and Murray have already stated support for this legislation, which will create new policies about biodiversity and other stewardship goals that BLM has been working on.

In the parlance of eco-speak, the term values can encompass virtually anything.   The BLM talks about "making project-level decisions that could impair wilderness characteristics."   Like values, characteristics can include anything from soup to nuts.   And while there are guidelines for "wilderness," not all land has to meet the standard thresholds.   WE dredged and discovered that there are miniscule parcels that have been classified as "wildlands."  What's the smallest?

Pelican Island Wilderness, northern Florida (6 acres) (Note: Until recently the Rocks and Islands Wilderness in northern California was thought to be the smallest wilderness, however, recent Bureau of Land Management acreage measurements put it at 19 acres instead of 5 acres.)

So, obviously anything is possible.  The Salazar letter asked something even more interesting:

     "What appropriate management changes would ensure that federally-managed lands in the San Juan Islands are conserved for future generations and are a part of the larger regional fabric of protected lands and waters?"

Now they're talking about a fabric of protection.   WE need to add that item to the buzzword list.

The warning is:   Any group or organization on a zero-net, rewilding mission can inject any manner of "value," "characteristic," "fabric of protection" or other buzzword "into the process" -- through chit-chat, correspondence, grant applications, even promotional literature -- about any given place.  That's a fact.  Moved by the spirit of collaboration (another buzzword to watch for), Salazar is reaching out to such interests to "fill in the blanks," and we think that's exactly what may happen.  In fact, it appears that this County resolution starts that ball rolling.
 
Among all the WHERAS statements in this county resolution - note that the resolution declares all three of these parcels as "ecologically important sites."    Why?    WE wish we knew who added that particular phrase to this resolution.

It says that Lummi Rocks and Carter Point (the Point is currently a lighthouse reserve on maps) are "in close proximity to" the DNR Lummi Island Natural Resource Conservation Area.   Being near a place with "ecological values including important raptor habit" is all that's required to make another parcel "ecologically important"?   Looks like it.   You can build a real daisy-chain (fabric?) of ecological importance using criteria like that.

And as for Chuckanut Rock, according to this it should also be an "ecologically important site" - because this resolution says Chuckanut Bay is scenic, with already established conservation easements, and so forth.   The daisy chain grows longer.

Line up the points on a map, and it doesn't take much geography skill to notice the long term risk of this resolution and these classifications.    The line between the properties crosses east-west, across the waters at the mouth of Bellingham Bay.   Could a "fabric of protection" present a problem to boaters and fishermen in the future?  Expansive and collaborative programs like this, that invite special interests to the game, have been tightening up access to preserved and "conservation" land across the nation, bite by bite through efforts like this.

When people ask, "How did things ever get so far out of control?"  The answer is, "By going along, that's how."

WE expect this to be blessed 7-0 in a heartbeat on August 9, just like the Alpine Legacy resolution was just a couple of weeks ago.  It's a glowing temptation for legislators to "make this a better place."    This is, after all, campaign season.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    WE Dredge!
    Picture
    Posting Rules:
    This forum is moderated.  Please make an effort to substantiate claims that support opinion.  Gratuitous profanity and ad-hominem attacks will not be accepted.  You can create a "nickname" if you'd like, and you don't have to reveal your e-mail address.   Feel free to share information and your honest thoughts.

    Categories

    All
    Agenda 21
    Best Available Science
    Big Government
    Eco Activism
    Ethics
    Freedom
    Planning
    Property Rights
    Science
    Small Business
    Social Engineering
    Taxes
    Welcome

    Archives

    January 2022
    September 2020
    August 2020
    April 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011


    Automatic Updates

    Do you want to be notified when new content is added to this newsfeed? Most browsers allow you to subscribe to our Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feed. Click on the RSS link below, and follow the instructions.

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.