The Whatcom Excavator
  • Home
    • About Us
    • Who's Planning Our Lives?
    • Diminishing Property Rights
    • NGO's & Public-Private Partners
    • Agenda 21
    • Buzzwords
    • Deep Thought
    • Best Available Science
    • Best Available Humor >
      • Humor Archive
  • The DREDGE
    • Gotta See This
    • How To Dredge
  • Bulldozed
    • Eco-Activism and County Policy
    • CELDF - "Democracy"
    • ALERT: Community Energy Challenge
  • Pig Trough
    • ReSources
    • Sustainable Connections
    • BALLE
    • ICLEI
    • Whatcom County Community Network
    • Big Wheels Award
  • Contact Us

PLF Offsite Mitigation Extortion Case, Dream of Justice

1/23/2013

1 Comment

 
NEWS FLASH:   WE just learned that the long awaited "Fenton Appeal" has failed under the weight of this county's Critical Areas Ordinance and the notorious cast of bully bureaucrats at PDS.  Read the Hearing Examiner's Summary of Appeal and Decision. Toward the end of the tortured story, in Section III, it explains that given the facts full justice may be found in a court of law.  But otherwise "a modest amount of offsite mitigation" might do.

As for the bureaucrats testimony, the decision failed to mention that the county's "expert witnesses" had no more than one week's training, or that Ecology's most senior witness had no direct experience conducting scientific studies in the field.  But they did have a manual and years of experience throwing the book at people.

Dream of justice, if you can.  It looks like this crushing regulation machine will keep grinding away unchecked.  Maybe the situation can be improved, but it won't happen if this ends here.  As for offsite mitigation shakedowns, take heart:


Picture
PLF Takes Property Rights Case to the Supreme Court
by Brian T. Hodges - January 23, 2013

PLF attorneys are back from Washington, D.C. after arguing a property rights case of national significance to the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this month. The case, Koontz v. St. John's River Water Management District, asks whether the Constitution protects property owners from government demands that require them to pay for unrelated public projects in order to receive permit approvals. In Koontz, a Florida land use agency demanded that Coy Koontz, Sr. pay to fix up government-owned property located miles away his property before the agency would issue any of the permits necessary for Koontz to develop his land.


Picture
L to R: Jim Burling, Paul Beard II, and Brian Hodges
Here in the Northwest, we are all-too-familiar with this kind of government shakedown. We have seen cities demand that landowners pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to provide new roads, drains, parks and other public benefits that have no relationship to proposed projects in order to secure permit approvals. The reason this scheme is so popular is simple: because a person has to secure government approval before he or she can make any lawful use of land, the government sees a permit application as a prime opportunity to get something for nothing.

PLF argued to the Supreme Court that the same constitutional principles that limit the government's authority to take land from permit applicants should apply when the government demands cash. After all, both are property and both are protected by the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

The issues raised in Koontz have exposed a sharp divide between those who believe that private property must be protected against government intrusions and those who believe that government must be given all of the authority necessary to achieve its goals. Those divisions were on display during the argument and in the briefs submitted to the Supreme Court (for example, we received a brief arguing that cash demands are essential to fund local government needs that was signed by several attorneys general, including those from Washington, Oregon, and California).

In the days leading up to and following the Koontz argument, PLF attorneys wrote a series of articles discussing the various aspects of the case on the PLF Liberty Blog that are well worth a read.

PLF should receive a ruling in Koontz by the end of June.


Read more on the PLF case if you have time.

If you look through the Fenton appeal decision, you'll find a long part that describes that Fenton met the hydrogeologist (Neugebauer) at a property rights event.  At the hearing, the county attorney took pains to characterize the scientist's passion for truth and his respect for property rights as if those were flaws.  The Hearing Examiner included all that, at length.  Why would a passion for science and respect for rights discredit a truly qualified expert witness?

Reflect that in 1955 quite a few in government didn't care one bit for people who dared to challenge institutions to stand for their rights.  Left, right or undeclared - think about it.  What are rights about, and should they be burdened and frustrated by domineering bullies in power?  Remember Charles Dalton's story?  Government should defend rights, not diminish them.

WE're glad that the Supreme Court is willing to take overreach and property rights seriously.   Rights aren't arbitrary.   They're personal.
1 Comment
Karl Uppiano link
1/24/2013 01:31:36 am

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. ~ Thomas Jefferson, The Declaration of Independence

Just how much abuse are we supposed to suffer before we are driven to invoke this argument a second time? How much is enough? Are we not citizens? We are subjects!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    WE Dredge!
    Picture
    Posting Rules:
    This forum is moderated.  Please make an effort to substantiate claims that support opinion.  Gratuitous profanity and ad-hominem attacks will not be accepted.  You can create a "nickname" if you'd like, and you don't have to reveal your e-mail address.   Feel free to share information and your honest thoughts.

    Categories

    All
    Agenda 21
    Best Available Science
    Big Government
    Eco Activism
    Ethics
    Freedom
    Planning
    Property Rights
    Science
    Small Business
    Social Engineering
    Taxes
    Welcome

    Archives

    January 2022
    September 2020
    August 2020
    April 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011


    Automatic Updates

    Do you want to be notified when new content is added to this newsfeed? Most browsers allow you to subscribe to our Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feed. Click on the RSS link below, and follow the instructions.

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.