The Whatcom Excavator
  • Home
    • About Us
    • Who's Planning Our Lives?
    • Diminishing Property Rights
    • NGO's & Public-Private Partners
    • Agenda 21
    • Buzzwords
    • Deep Thought
    • Best Available Science
    • Best Available Humor >
      • Humor Archive
  • The DREDGE
    • Gotta See This
    • How To Dredge
  • Bulldozed
    • Eco-Activism and County Policy
    • CELDF - "Democracy"
    • ALERT: Community Energy Challenge
  • Pig Trough
    • ReSources
    • Sustainable Connections
    • BALLE
    • ICLEI
    • Whatcom County Community Network
    • Big Wheels Award
  • Contact Us

On Independence Day, Liberty, and Kings

7/2/2013

3 Comments

 
Picture
Two hundred thirty-seven years ago, as Abraham Lincoln described it so brilliantly, “our forefathers brought forth to this continent a new nation conceived in Liberty.”

As Independence Day nears, it’s a good time to reflect on that ideal - on liberty and the meaning of representative government, particularly as it operates here.

Numerous local campaigns are underway, and politicians of all stripes will vie for votes promising to “protect” every aspect of modern life for us - health, safety, and welfare.  Some campaign promises will likely include pledges to protect the world from us. Will protection include safekeeping citizens liberty? Likely few candidates will willingly address the growing reach and imbalance of the local administrative state, and how that impacts freedom. Even the best-intentioned may find themselves veering away from the topic, worried that standing up for freedom will be interpreted as radical.

Our forefathers suffered prolonged distress and oppression at the hands of a king at a time when power was centralized, and top-down hierarchy was the norm of social order. The will of “the people” was an irritant, and loyal subjects had no choice but endure the indignities of subservience. The power of the state was absolute, and life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were vulnerable to the whims of local magistrates and bureaucracies. Freedom was limited to permissions. [Does this ring any bells?] And measures to maintain the king’s central order carried the weight of the crown, without regard to rights or the burdens carried by the “governed.”

The nation’s founders, early classical liberals, dared to rebel when talk of liberty sent upstarts to the gallows. The colonials fought, somehow prevailed, and the rest as they say “is history.” Every 4th of July flags wave, and we celebrate living in the land of the free.

How much of the founding Liberty that Lincoln spoke of is still relevant? Has the protection of our freedoms become passe' now, if that duty is considered at all?  Perhaps some rights should be forfeited to achieve bureaucratically controlled designs to achieve community “visions” of progress.  And perhaps we should accept that our private property is a "natural resource" that the state and county should manage.  NOT.  Much of this new local "governance" smacks of dominion, not far from the ham-fisted control that infuriated colonials.

While politicians walk in local parades this week surrounded by flags, touting American beliefs, conviction to freedom may not stir in their hearts. The idea that “government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth” may seem laughable and hackneyed. "Get with the program, times have changed. Polls confirm what the people want, which is holistic and sustainable community management."

We have a county executive who promised he wouldn't “be ideological,” but goes whole hog for this stuff. Following suit, candidates left and right scramble to avoid the issue of rights as they fit into the big picture. Have the foundations of representative democracy become vestigial, given the local political climate?  WE feel that top-down bullying and magisterial orders feel like a yoke. Mountains of bureaucratic dictums and regulation should not incapacitate the flexibility and wisdom of the people to manage their lives, businesses, homes, and farms.  The "the private sector" must not be considered the government's oyster.

WE are not in bad company. Here’s a quote written by the Supreme Court that’s only a few days old:

         “The essence of democracy is that the right to make law rests in the people and flows to the government, not the other way around. Freedom resides first in the people without need of a grant from government.”

Those words were published in Washington DC on June 26th in regard to state initiatives. It’s something of a national shame that the statement was written in a Supreme Court dissent (Case 12-144).

Four justices that some would expect not to agree did agree about “these truths.”  (Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Alito and Sotomayor)  So, the principles of liberty still rattle in a few highly placed heads, just as these important concepts remain central to our state and federal constitutions. But how functionally important are liberty concepts here, in this county?

Too often in the hallowed halls of the Whatcom County courthouse it's said that “people need to give up some rights” for the greater good. Really? Should that ever be necessary, much less permissible? And we hear that "anything not permitted isn't permitted."  Government is taking our rights, and selling them back to us as permits! How does that "square" with the Supreme Court statement above?

This area's bureaucrats assume a prostrate position when interpreting federal and state dictums, particularly any dictum that comes with grant funds tied to its tail.

Instead of the state having to prove that some problem or nuisance has occurred, citizens are asked to “prove” that future activity will do no harm. Precautionary principle trumps constitutional principle. Our local guilty until proven innocent regulations and restrictions about "community resource protection" turn justice itself on its head.


Picture
Speaking of heads, Jack Louws has made a habit of saying he’s "the head of Whatcom County."  WE see a bit of a crown on the guy...  Has “a man who would be king” moved into the corner office of the county courthouse? For years he's been sitting on boards, voting to wheel-and-deal public funds, and building up a retinue of courtiers.

He and his county department heads don't seem overly fond of Council scrutiny.  Recent moves were made to expand administrative latitude to simplify (avoid) council's informed review and consent of spending decisions, "for efficiency."  Uh-huh.


PictureWho's the boss?
And talk in the county is that he brought the “Lynden Mafia” along. Well-heeled consigliares and lieutenants whisper in his ear, with raging appetites to split economic and resource pies.  Not all policy decisions affecting our lives and business are made in council chambers, not by a long shot.

WE dislike the notion that kingly power, or godfathers, should dominate representative government. Legitimate power "rests in the people." Here's to honest self-governance, open and accountable.

This nation once confronted a king, declaring
  • He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. (See Executive appointments and advisory committees, plus other favored "partners" and special "teams".)

  • He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance. (Remember this, with it's educational goal being "give in".)

  • He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; … in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within. (Promoting that Whatcom County should go along with outside control and interests, like the WIT - and this outside "integration" isn't going away.)

You may recognize these brief excerpts from the Declaration of Independence. But aren't we getting that sort of treatment today?

WE thought this was supposed to be a free country. We feel the people deserve better than to be "managed." We're citizens, not subjects.


3 Comments
Greg Brown
7/2/2013 05:03:37 pm

Wow ! Great article. The sad thing is that I saw the machine in action today at the Natural Resources Board meeting. It was so sad to hear the County Executive's "henchmen"; Councilman Kremen, Parks Director Mike McFarland; and, Whatcom Land Trust's Rand Jack paint the rose colored picture of a vision without a plan. These people will destroy what is left of our local culture and economy in the name of personal grandiose, financial gain and control. Enough said....

Reply
Karl Uppiano link
7/3/2013 02:02:04 am

When I first read this, I thought it might be unnecessarily hard on poor ol' Jack. But really, although it singles him out (because Whatcom is our county), this is a nationwide problem at all levels ov government. Executive branches keep demanding more power, and legislatures keep giving it to them.

Not only that, but legislatures keep dreaming up these big acts that can only be implemented by big, unelected bureaucracies, which then get turned over to the executive branch to administer. So the administration has all these huge agencies to control -- and through which to control.

If this goes on long enough, the legislative branch will render themselves irrelevant, along with the citizens that they're supposed to represent. I submit that this has already happened to a large extent. It's not a conspiracy, it's a process, like glaciers moving downstream. Unlike glaciers, we could undo it if we had the foresight. After all, this is government, run by humans.

Power to the people!

Reply
Kris Haltemran link
7/3/2013 07:38:18 am

Mitch Friedman says that Whatcom County will "lilely" see more revenue if the 8,800 acres of reconveyed land is converted to a park than maintained in its present state (as a public asset where commercial forestry and low impact recreational use is tolerated and could be outright permitted if a park plan were to be established), but no one calls him on his past criminal offenses against commercial forestry (a sustainable activity), the re-wilding project he has been working towards for decades now and the recent Sierra Club actions to shut-down mountain bike parks all over the United States. Mr. Friedman and Conservation NW have used the Mt. Bike Clubs for their benefit of numbers and organization...but the truth tells me that they will never see the fruition of their labor for it:


Sierra Club signs onto lawsuit to stop Timberline MTB Park
bikeportland.org/.../sierra-club-signs-onto-lawsuit-to-stop-timberline-mtb-p...
May 17, 2013 - Image from Timberline Mountain Bike Park brochure. In a statement about the lawsuit, Sierra Club Oregon Conservation Director Rhett ...

Sierra Club Joins Lawsuit Against Mountain Bike Park
www.adventure-journal.com/.../sierra-club-joins-lawsuit-against-mountain-...
May 22, 2013 - There appears to be no easy path to a planned mountain bike park at Timberline on Mt. Hood. This past week the Sierra Club joined a lawsuit ...

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    WE Dredge!
    Picture
    Posting Rules:
    This forum is moderated.  Please make an effort to substantiate claims that support opinion.  Gratuitous profanity and ad-hominem attacks will not be accepted.  You can create a "nickname" if you'd like, and you don't have to reveal your e-mail address.   Feel free to share information and your honest thoughts.

    Categories

    All
    Agenda 21
    Best Available Science
    Big Government
    Eco Activism
    Ethics
    Freedom
    Planning
    Property Rights
    Science
    Small Business
    Social Engineering
    Taxes
    Welcome

    Archives

    January 2022
    September 2020
    August 2020
    April 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011


    Automatic Updates

    Do you want to be notified when new content is added to this newsfeed? Most browsers allow you to subscribe to our Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feed. Click on the RSS link below, and follow the instructions.

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.