The Whatcom Excavator
  • Home
    • About Us
    • Who's Planning Our Lives?
    • Diminishing Property Rights
    • NGO's & Public-Private Partners
    • Agenda 21
    • Buzzwords
    • Deep Thought
    • Best Available Science
    • Best Available Humor >
      • Humor Archive
  • The DREDGE
    • Gotta See This
    • How To Dredge
  • Bulldozed
    • Eco-Activism and County Policy
    • CELDF - "Democracy"
    • ALERT: Community Energy Challenge
  • Pig Trough
    • ReSources
    • Sustainable Connections
    • BALLE
    • ICLEI
    • Whatcom County Community Network
    • Big Wheels Award
  • Contact Us

WA Ecology Puts Kibosh on Useful Science About Phosphorous - Why?

8/4/2012

2 Comments

 
This story is mighty revealing:

State won’t fund phosphorus research
in Spokane River
Becky Kramer The Spokesman-Review
 August 2, 2012

The Washington Department of Ecology has opted not to pay for additional research by a University of Washington professor whose earlier work suggested that not all of the phosphorus discharged into the Spokane River leads to rampant algae growth and poor water quality.

Michael T. Brett, the professor, had strong words about the agency’s recent decision not to contribute to a second study costing $75,000.

“I think Ecology is aggressively trying to put the kibosh on the science,” said Brett, an environmental scientist in UW’s engineering department. “… Because the results are complicating their policy, they’re trying to make the science go away.”

Brett said that he and his fellow researchers believe they are close to discovering why some types of phosphorus promote algae growth while others don’t. The work could have ramifications for cities, Spokane County and companies that discharge treated wastewater into the Spokane River. The dischargers face multimillion-dollar plant upgrades to meet strict new limits aimed at reducing the phosphorus flowing into the river by 90 percent.

Department of Ecology officials, however, said while Brett’s research is academically valuable, the science hasn’t advanced enough to relax phosphorus limits in discharge permits. A second study isn’t likely to change that, said David Moore, Ecology’s watershed unit supervisor.

“Bioavailability (of phosphorus) may be a good tool in the future, but the science isn’t there to support it,” he said. “The science would need to be overwhelming for us to make that change.”

Ecology, dischargers split bill for pilot study

The Ecology Department paid for about half of an earlier, $110,000 pilot study by Brett, which tested effluent from six sewage treatment plants that discharge into the river. Dischargers picked up the rest of the tab.

Brett said the pilot results, released last year, indicated that some forms of phosphorus don’t spur the algae growth that leads to low oxygen levels and water-quality problems in the reservoir behind Long Lake Dam.

“For some reason, the algae and the bacteria just can’t use it,” he said. “The analogy I use is sugar-free gum. It has a lot of energy in it, but our bodies don’t have the enzymes to use the carbon” in the gum.

Sid Frederickson, Coeur d’Alene’s wastewater utilities superintendent, said he’s disappointed that Ecology won’t ante up for additional research.

“He (Brett) has every right to be upset, and so do all the rest of us who participated in the funding of round one,” Frederickson said.

“Do we have enough data right now to go out and rewrite discharge permits? No, I don’t think we do … (But) I think the research should be funded as expeditiously as possible. If the permit limits can be relaxed, that will be a great boon to ratepayers.”   (...more)

. . . . 

"Trying to make the science go away," that's troubling.    And this comes from an impeccably qualified scientist, not the right-wing fringe.   Maybe this research would be useful in understanding the 'phosphorous problem' in Lake Whatcom.

It's not ethical or constructive for government to impose heavier regulatory burdens on citizens without the willingness to prove scientifically that a problem exists that needs to be mitigated, can be mitigated (practically or theoretically), or that the burden will even accomplish anything.

Why is this powerful agency turning a blind eye to better science?    It certainly raises questions about the department's agenda.   Are they working to help us or to hobble us unnecessarily?    Ecology has a huge budget, and $75 thousand is a miniscule amount to spend compared to what they blow on other things.
2 Comments
Greg Brown
8/4/2012 04:21:59 am

This is a fairly in-expensive study as compared to what the WCC will spend for playground equipment and various studies they have done by private contractors. It seems that as important that this could be to the residents of the Lake
Whatcom Watershed as well as the rest of us in the County, maybe we should pick up the second half of the study. We don’t have to let the Department of Ecology make this determination.

If it can be determined for a few dollars that the phosphorus issues for the Lake are much less damaging, then look what might be saved by not having to continue to create what could be unnecessary regulation.

Just a thought..


I passed this along to the WCC, Executive, PDS, and our 42nd District Elected Officials

Reply
Dave Onkels
8/4/2012 06:16:09 am

The comment thread following the Spokesman Review article is illuminating. it contains several comments by the original researcher.

http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2012/aug/02/state-wont-fund-more-research-on-phosphorus-in/

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    WE Dredge!
    Picture
    Posting Rules:
    This forum is moderated.  Please make an effort to substantiate claims that support opinion.  Gratuitous profanity and ad-hominem attacks will not be accepted.  You can create a "nickname" if you'd like, and you don't have to reveal your e-mail address.   Feel free to share information and your honest thoughts.

    Categories

    All
    Agenda 21
    Best Available Science
    Big Government
    Eco Activism
    Ethics
    Freedom
    Planning
    Property Rights
    Science
    Small Business
    Social Engineering
    Taxes
    Welcome

    Archives

    January 2022
    September 2020
    August 2020
    April 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011


    Automatic Updates

    Do you want to be notified when new content is added to this newsfeed? Most browsers allow you to subscribe to our Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feed. Click on the RSS link below, and follow the instructions.

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.