The Whatcom Excavator
  • Home
    • About Us
    • Who's Planning Our Lives?
    • Diminishing Property Rights
    • NGO's & Public-Private Partners
    • Agenda 21
    • Buzzwords
    • Deep Thought
    • Best Available Science
    • Best Available Humor >
      • Humor Archive
  • The DREDGE
    • Gotta See This
    • How To Dredge
  • Bulldozed
    • Eco-Activism and County Policy
    • CELDF - "Democracy"
    • ALERT: Community Energy Challenge
  • Pig Trough
    • ReSources
    • Sustainable Connections
    • BALLE
    • ICLEI
    • Whatcom County Community Network
    • Big Wheels Award
  • Contact Us

Watch This Like Hawks - The Natural Resources Marketplace Implementation is Underway

3/30/2012

4 Comments

 
Sorry to report that Tuesday night Whatcom County Council, under the cover of a carefully couched palm-greasing grant funded by the EPA, gave the go-ahead to Planning and Development to implement the natural resources marketplace (NRM).  In fairness, council couldn't resist.  The grant was slathered with bait and buzzwords:   ag, watershed, restoration, pilot project, "plan to plan."   For their sins, they got a plaque and a big "smile for the camera" photo-op on the spot, from one of the NRM's prime Seattle backers.

WE hope citizens step up to the plate and watch this like hawks.   How?   There's information at the tail-end of this post.

The Excavator raised alerts about the NRM in August of last year and then again in October.   Although we narrowly escaped a county opt-in to the Ruckelshaus process that had the NRM buried seamlessly within, there was never much question that the "marketplace" proponents would continue to beat on their missionary drum.

Until now the "Natural Resources Marketplace Working Group" met well beyond the scrutiny of the public.   Now the rogues gallery of control obsessives led by city-living Farm Friends will reconvene quickly.  They've posted a new official "crew," but don't be fooled.    Task 1.7 of the implementation plan calls for "Facilitation of and participation in the RC [review committee], discussions with existing working groups, committees, and organizations on regular basis throughout the Task period where progress is discussed and stakeholder input is received (24 additional contacts and est. 20 meetings)."   As happens so often, advocates and cherry-picked proponents will pave our world with more policy and regulation.   This time they're taking the game to a whole new level.

Government management of persons through the use of their private property is all the rage in the planning-ecology universe.   The NRM report (Page 20 of the PDF is much easier to see) illustrates the kind of  command and control debit-and-credit utopian world this group envisions:
Picture
Just this month, a fresh set of global alarm predictions and recommendations was trotted out by global environment alarmists.   See the "solution" they offer?   It's a dead ringer for the NRM.

OECD RELEASES "ENVIRONMENTAL OUTLOOK TO 2050: THE CONSEQUENCES OF INACTION"
Earlier this month, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) released an analysis entitled, "The OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050" which poses the question "What will the next four decades bring?" Based on joint modeling by the OECD and the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), it looks forward to the year 2050 to predict what demographic and economic trends might mean for the environment if the world does not adopt more ambitious green policies. It also looks at what policies could change that picture for the better. The analysis focuses on four areas: climate change, biodiversity, freshwater and health impacts of pollution.

The report projects that despite the recent recession, the global economy could nearly quadruple by 2050. Rising living standards will be accompanied by ever growing demands for energy, food and natural resources, and more pollution. The costs of inaction could be colossal, both in economic and human terms. Without new policies, the report suggests that:

The report concludes that these projections highlight the urgent need for new thinking. Failing that, the erosion of the world's environmental capital will increase the risk of irreversible changes that could jeopardize two centuries of rising living standards. Well-designed policies to tackle environmental problems can also help to address other environmental challenges, and contribute to growth and development. Tackling local air pollution contributes not only to cutting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but also to reducing the economic burden of chronic and costly health problems. Moreover, climate policies help protect biodiversity, for example by reducing emissions from deforestation.

To avert the future painted by the "Environmental Outlook to 2050,"
the report recommends a cocktail of policy solutions: using environmental taxes and emissions trading schemes to make pollution more costly than greener alternatives; valuing and pricing natural assets and ecosystem services like clean air, water and biodiversity for their true worth; removing environmentally harmful subsidies to fossil fuels or wasteful irrigation schemes; and, encouraging green innovation by making polluting production and consumption modes more expensive while providing public support for basic research and development (R&D).

Read the key facts and figures from the "Environmental Outlook to 2050"
here.   The report itself is available here.

Worth fighting?   WE report, you decide - but decide soon.   This is upon us.   The first step would be getting your name or group added to the "interested party" list at Planning - probably by e-mailing Samya Lutz:  [email protected]
4 Comments
Karl Uppiano link
3/29/2012 11:04:12 pm

As citizens, and property owners (some of us), We the People need to get ourselves firmly established as "stake holders". If WE do not have a stake in this attack from the illiberal control freaks on our freedom, then who does?

Nobody is advocating trashing the planet, but don't be fooled: There are ways to protect the environment without trashing liberty. The free market (as it always does) will automatically adjust to changing needs and conditions more fairly than any government action. "The Tragedy of the Commons" is a brilliant straw man, but he is made entirely of straw. One step too near Lady Liberty's flame, and he's a goner.

Reply
childofww2
3/30/2012 01:45:00 am

Thanks for the inside scoop WE - you are such an asset to our community

Reply
MissOdie
3/30/2012 03:25:16 pm

Looks like Cap and Trade on steroids to me. So, if the County Council and Executive have any common sense, they already know that the public is totally against Cap and Trade. Why would they willingly subject the tax paying, private property owners to this monster? Who is being paid off? Why isn't there honest representation in our County politicians? Do they believe in "private property rights" or are the rights of the community above individual rights? Are they pushing "communitarism" and knowingly betraying their promise to protect and defend the individual's constitutional rights? Folks, we have to wake the County Executive and Council up! They're asleep at the wheel and we're all in the car without our seat belts on.

Reply
Country Gal
4/1/2012 08:22:13 am

As the Excavator says right here:

BEWARE of all mechanisms that diminish full control of your property. Every time “public purpose” expands, the remaining amount of private property available to us – and to future generations – diminishes as well.

By using words like “voluntary,” “enhancement,” and “restoration” in programs laws and code, policy-makers and regulators have found a way to skip past (and evade) the legal necessity to prove tangible adverse impact. Conservation programs press people to forfeit uses (easements, access and consumption of water, tying up land in native vegetation) in very coercive ways. There will be very little “property” rights left to defend soon, the way things are going.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    WE Dredge!
    Picture
    Posting Rules:
    This forum is moderated.  Please make an effort to substantiate claims that support opinion.  Gratuitous profanity and ad-hominem attacks will not be accepted.  You can create a "nickname" if you'd like, and you don't have to reveal your e-mail address.   Feel free to share information and your honest thoughts.

    Categories

    All
    Agenda 21
    Best Available Science
    Big Government
    Eco Activism
    Ethics
    Freedom
    Planning
    Property Rights
    Science
    Small Business
    Social Engineering
    Taxes
    Welcome

    Archives

    January 2022
    September 2020
    August 2020
    April 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011


    Automatic Updates

    Do you want to be notified when new content is added to this newsfeed? Most browsers allow you to subscribe to our Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feed. Click on the RSS link below, and follow the instructions.

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.