The Whatcom Excavator
  • Home
    • About Us
    • Who's Planning Our Lives?
    • Diminishing Property Rights
    • NGO's & Public-Private Partners
    • Agenda 21
    • Buzzwords
    • Deep Thought
    • Best Available Science
    • Best Available Humor >
      • Humor Archive
  • The DREDGE
    • Gotta See This
    • How To Dredge
  • Bulldozed
    • Eco-Activism and County Policy
    • CELDF - "Democracy"
    • ALERT: Community Energy Challenge
  • Pig Trough
    • ReSources
    • Sustainable Connections
    • BALLE
    • ICLEI
    • Whatcom County Community Network
    • Big Wheels Award
  • Contact Us

WIT Meeting Report, A Citizen's View

2/7/2013

0 Comments

 
Some citizens attended the Whatcom Integration Team meeting held December 11. This is the report submitted by one ~ Editors

Have you ever wondered where all of the money goes that you and the rest of the nation freely provide to our government?  You hear all kinds of stories of the bridges to nowhere, extravagant agency parties, and overpriced muffins.  Well, the following is an example of that very same type of spending going on in Whatcom County.

Have you ever heard of the Puget Sound Partnership (PSP)?  Well, PSP is a Non-Government Organization that was charged “by Governor Gregoire and the Legislature… to create a real Action Agenda that turns things around and leads to a healthy Puget Sound”.  The PSP states that it “is a community effort of citizens, governments, tribes, scientists and businesses working together to restore and protect Puget Sound”.

Here in Whatcom County the PSP and our county government are financing a special group of people called the Whatcom Integration Team (WIT) with our money to “clean up and protect Puget Sound”.  Having attended the second in a series of up to eight  monthly meetings between November of 2012 and June of 2013, the pointless spending and the planned continuum of spending was obvious.  There were 17 individuals siting at the table and an additional 3 sitting away from the table for a total of 20.  When you assume an hour travel time to and from the two hour meeting it adds up to 60 man-hours of work.  If you also assume a very conservative average wage $50.00 per hour, that is about $3,000.00 per meeting and a total of $24,000 for all of the planned meetings.  Add into this the cost of the contracted meeting facilitator.  The County Executive just recently increased the contract value for this person an addition $90,000 for a total of approximately ???.

A second and somewhat unexpected sign of the wanton spending was the open comments by participants that they needed to make sure that they structured the meetings results to identify the best outcomes to assure their ability to obtain additional grant moneys from the government.  It is also noted that the meeting schedule (interestingly called a “roadmap”) shows that for Meeting #5 (in March) the “members consider options for criteria for grant funding purposes”.  One can draw their own conclusions from this type of thinking, but to us it is wasteful thinking and not necessarily keeping with any concept of reduced government and reduced spending.

The third indication of this fanciful and unnecessary over-spending only proposition was the makeup of the meeting members.  The members are from our county and city planning staff, from Ecology, from the tribes, from the Whatcom Land Trust, from Farm Friends and from various other resource groups and non-profit organizations.  Where are the citizens and business representation that were identified in the PSP community effort?  Where are the local experts from the water, farming and timber industries?  Where are the other private business interests? Where are the property owners whose fates are being determined by this unofficial and non-binding non-government organizational “Team”?

Finally, the meeting provided the cover for an outcome that could surely have been determined by even the very minimally informed progressive thinker. The first meeting  identified the ecosystem the members wanted to include, the services or things that the ecosystem may provide for, the pressures or threats that society places on these ecosystem services, and the community values and attributes that are part of the ecosystems.  Wow, is that a mouthful!  As an example, forests are an ecosystem.  Biodiversity is a service for this ecosystem.  One of the pressures or threats to this service is recreational activities while recreation is also an example of a community value or attribute.  The meeting facilitator had organized all of this information into 10 separate ecosystems, 12 services, 16 pressures and 20 values.   These items were divided into two separate tables that each shared the ecosystems on the horizontal axis and the ecosystem services on the vertical axis.  One table identifies the community attributes for each ecosystem or ecosystem service and the second table identifies the pressures on each of the ecosystem or ecosystem service (refer to the WIT Tables) (pdf).   After the first hour of the meeting the members had pretty much agreed on the tables with a few additions to both the community values and to the pressures.  The facilitator pointed out that the local community “visioning” results were reviewed to assure that nothing had been overlooked. (Let’s make sure we cross all the T’s and dot all the I’s.)

During the second hour of the meeting, the members were given two sets of four each individual sticky notes.  The members were instructed to use these pads to help determine the priorities of the community attributes listed on one whiteboard, and the separate attributes for the pressures as listed on a second whiteboard.   Those values and pressures that received the most sticky notes would have the highest priorities.  Well, who could have guessed the outcome from such a Delphi experience?  Lo and behold, the top three community values were sustainability, green infrastructure, and quality of life respectively.  The top three pressures were climate change, residential and commercial development; and, agriculture and livestock grazing respectively.  These are personal impressions, not science. Are these not the primary focus of the all too familiar effort for the increasing pressure that seems to grow in leaps and bounds on the ecosystem called property rights?   All too many meetings just like this one are just a small part of the increasing threat to our rights as citizens in the name of the environment and the collective.

This is just one example of these non-binding non-government organizations that seem to inundate our culture and government activity.  Does it seem ironic that these non-binding findings are generated by professional, full time paid employees who are doing their “day” jobs?  Where is the community effort?  Where are  the citizens and business members?  Unsurprisingly, they are working at their day jobs to pay the individuals sitting at these tables scheming to usurp our constitutionally protected natural rights, under the cover of environmentalism.

One of the scariest things is that this example is also going on without the full knowledge and approval of our own County Council.  Funding for many of these groups does not pass through the council agenda, as they can be approved by County Department Heads or the County Executive. We all need to pay more attention to where the money is coming from and what it is being spent on. 

The County Council should put the Whatcom Integration Team out of business by taking away their funding.  This should be the WIT’s end.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    WE Dredge!
    Picture
    Posting Rules:
    This forum is moderated.  Please make an effort to substantiate claims that support opinion.  Gratuitous profanity and ad-hominem attacks will not be accepted.  You can create a "nickname" if you'd like, and you don't have to reveal your e-mail address.   Feel free to share information and your honest thoughts.

    Categories

    All
    Agenda 21
    Best Available Science
    Big Government
    Eco Activism
    Ethics
    Freedom
    Planning
    Property Rights
    Science
    Small Business
    Social Engineering
    Taxes
    Welcome

    Archives

    January 2022
    September 2020
    August 2020
    April 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011


    Automatic Updates

    Do you want to be notified when new content is added to this newsfeed? Most browsers allow you to subscribe to our Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feed. Click on the RSS link below, and follow the instructions.

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.